Marijuana Legalization: What’s the
Cost?
Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit substance. Marijuana abuse
and dependence are widespread in the United States (American Psychiatric
Association, 2000; Compton et al., 2007; Johnston et al., 2009, 2010; Office
of Applied Studies, 2008). Marijuana is a topic of significant public
discussion, and while many are familiar with the debates, there are many
facets to examine further to determine if it should be legalized. Moreover,
there is not much evidence-based information that is relevant and readily
available on the topic. When trying to decide if our state legislature
should legalize marijuana, it is important to highlight the stance the
federal government’s take on this issue and consider which approach would make
improvements to public health and safety in our community. The federal
government opposes legalization of marijuana because it would “increase
the availability and use of illicit drugs, and pose significant health and
safety risks to all Americans, particularly young people.” (The White House, 2015)
Marijuana poses substantial risks
to public health and significant danger to the health and safety of society. (The White House, 2015) Close to 4.2 million people met the
criteria for abuse or dependence on marijuana in 2011, which has been
associated with addition, respiratory conditions, and cognitive impairment.
In addition, research shows that increasing the accessibility of drugs can increase
use and in turn, bring about greater consequences. Greater consumption of
marijuana leads to greater public health and financial costs for the general
public. It has been shown that alcohol and tobacco, which are legal and
taxed, already cause much higher social costs than the returns they generate.
Benefits of legalization may include pain
management and nausea control for cancer and HIV/AIDS patients, decreased
costs of the criminal justice system, and tax revenue from sales (Levine and Reinarman,
1991; van den Brink, 2008; Wodak, 2002). It has also been pointed out
that those with seizure disorders may benefit from marijuana. Marijuana may
also contain an anti-inflammatory effect (Nagarkatti, et al. 2009) and
may bring relief to some patients with inflammatory bowel
disease.(Esposito et al., 2013). However, there is currently no consensus on
the effectiveness of marijuana as a treatment for symptoms of pain,
nausea, and other symptoms caused by sicknesses or treatment (Joy et al.,
1999; MacCoun and Reuter, 2001a; Martín-Sánchez et al., 2009).
Due to the lack of medical consensus at present means that both positive and
negative promoters of medical marijuana laws can find research to support
their positions. (Cerdá et al., 2012)
Colorado has experienced healthy system
effects due to legalization. There has been an increase in visits to
hospitals due to marijuana intoxication associated with anxiety, panic
attacks, and vomiting to name a few.The
legalization has also resulted in an increased prevalence of burns, cyclic
vomiting syndrome, The most concerning health effects have the rate of
ingestion among children. Fifteen children were seen for ingestion over
the past two years at Children’s Hospital of Colorado. (Wang, Roosevelt,
& Hears, 2013).
Although marijuana legalization has been
shown by some to be successful, there have also been unfortunate and
unpleasant health effects. There are many risks surrounding the use of
marijuana. Additional research is needed to examine the benefits and hazards
of marijuana use to determine if it is beneficial to healthcare before that
can be a valid reason to examine legalization further.
Compton,
W.M., Conway, K.P., Stinson, F.S., Colliver, J.D., Grant, B.F. (2005).
Prevalence,
correlates,
and comorbidity of DSM-IV antisocial personality syndromes and alcohol
and specific drug use disorders in the United States: results from the National
Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Clin.
Psychiatry 66, 677–685.
Esposito, G., Filippis, D. D., Cirillo, C., Iuvone, T.,
Capoccia, E., Scuderi, C., & Steardo, L. (2013). Cannabidiol in
inflammatory bowel diseases: a brief overview. Phytotherapy
Research, 27(5),
633-636.
Johnston,
L.D., O’Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Schulenberg, J.E. (2009).
Monitoring
the future
national survey results on drug use, 1975–2008. In: Volume II: College
Students. NIH
Publication No. 10-7586. National Institute on Drug Abuse,
Bethesda,
MD.
Johnston,
L.D., O’Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Schulenberg, J.E. (2010).
Monitoring the
future national
survey results on drug use, 1975–2009. In: Volume I: Secondary
School
Students. NIH Publication No. 10-7584. National Institute on
Drug Abuse,
Bethesda,
MD.
Joy,
J., Watson Jr., S., Benson, J. (Eds.), (1999). Marijuana and Medicine:
Assessing the
Science
Base. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Levine,
H.G., Reinarman, C. (1991). From prohibition to regulation—lessons from
alcohol
policy for
drug policy. Milbank Q. 69, 461–494.
MacCoun,
R., Reuter, P. (Eds.), 2001a. Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices,
Times,
and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Martín-Sánchez,
E., Furukawa, T., Taylor, J., Martin, J. (2009). Systematic review and
meta-analysis
of cannabis treatment for chronic pain. Pain Med. 10,
1353–1368.
Nagarkatti, P., Pandey, R., Rieder, S. A., Hegde, V. L.,
& Nagarkatti, M. (2009). Cannabinoids as novel anti-inflammatory drugs. Future
medicinal chemistry, 1(7), 1333-1349.
Office
of Applied Studies ( 2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey
on Drug
Use
and Health: National Findings. DHHS Publication No. SMA 08-4343, NSDUH
Series
H-34. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
Rockville,
MD.
Monte,
A. A., Zane, R. D., & Heard, K. J. (2014). The Implications of Marijuana
Legalization in Colorado. JAMA.
van den
Brink, W. (2008). Forum: decriminalization of
cannabis. Curr. Opin. Psychiatr.
21,
122–126.
Wang, G. S., Roosevelt, G., & Heard, K. (2013).
Pediatric marijuana exposures in a medical marijuana state. JAMA
pediatrics, 167(7), 630-633.
White
House, Marijuana https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/marijuana
Wodak,
A. (2002). For and against—cannabis control: costs outweigh the benefits.
For. Br.
Med. J. 324, 105–106.
|
Sent from my iPhone
No comments:
Post a Comment